Source Of Peace
Monday, August 15, 2011
Wednesday, August 3, 2011
Declare Yourself Free
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, which among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. To oppress these rights, governments have been instituted among men, deriving their powers out of the fear of the governed. Whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new roads for their future. Such has been the patient sufferance of these people; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present Government is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these people. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world. They have refused assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. They have refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. They have called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with their measures. They have dissolved laws, to enact oppressive invasions on the rights of the people. They have has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers. They have has made judges dependent on their will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. They have combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving assent to their acts of pretended legislation. For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of a fair trial. For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses. For suspending our own legislatures and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. Governments whose characters are thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant unfit for a free people.
Friday, July 29, 2011
Communism
Good government is no substitute for self-government
Communism is a classless society in which private ownership has been abolished and the means of production and subsistence belong to the community. Communism is a society where each one works according to his abilities and gets according to his needs. Today we work hard just to survive and we can barely do that. Many people work multiple jobs to do just that, while others whose work is regarded as important contribute little to the whole. When we think of disease prevention we only give credit to the doctors, what of the garbage workers and waste disposal units? Without the later would we not have streets filled with rotting food, sewers overflowing with feces and waste? The doctor would then be of little use as everyone would be sick and dying at higher rates than even now. However a doctor is paid even more than these unsung heroes. Why? One commonly given answer is that the doctor paid a lot of money for school and spent a lot of time to get when they are. There is that thing hinders us all, money. What if the doctor did not need to pay money to get where they are? Someone would say no one would want to do such a job without payment. Surely this is not emotionally true, someone has to desire the knowledge and satisfaction the job brings. Though in a communistic society, without currency, being a doctor, doing what you are capable of doing guarantees you all your needs. Home, food, and the same luxuries as everyone else, so long as you put into the society it will give back. When you break it down to the essential variables that affect everyone, no one is more or less important than another. This does not lead to a loss of individuality that is built as you grow. Without currency education is free for as long as you seek it and give labor into society. All the people who would not be able to afford an education and reach their full potential in the current world society could reach the stars. Some think in a communistic society everyone would be in cookie cutter houses. This would be untrue housing would be based on needs. There are many routed for these needs, one person merely needs a studio apartment or single bedroom, and I am sure the math is easy to follow from there. There are homeless that wish to work to obtain housing, in a communist society the employer is not bound by a status quo and can hire without limit. In this economic world all things are centered on the almighty dollar, but in a communist society the center is the people. Sure production will change within a company from one thing to another to keep up with the demand, but nobody would be without. Children would not need to work and the age 18 could be a possibility to start putting into the whole. Since everyone would be working somewhere the overall quality of life would be improved. This is however something that could only be acquired if done worldwide. There are materials only certain regions have and others need everyone works together giving without currency exchanged and receiving what they need in return. Everyone and everything is of equal importance, there is no pound per pound exchange no bartering. Everyone benefits when everyone works whether it be as a doctor, teacher, driver, stocker, manager or anything else. People can do the jobs they desire and while contributing to society want nothing it’s all provided. Some think luxuries like televisions and games would not count to the need mentioned, and they don’t but when everyone is working such luxuries can be provided to everyone. As I said however either everyone is in or no one is, sure a few that don’t want to work would need to be excluded from the whole. With this society the entire human race would prosper and not just lucky individuals, is that not what we strive for? It does no good to place all power and wealth in one place or on one person, but when all people are equal it takes more to conquer us than when there are fewer beacons to take. Many look at how communism has played out in the world and have disdain for it and i will tell you why. in the world communism is used as a government when it is not. communism is the idea of the people for the people where the only thing is the people. communism is just this, the abolition of currency and the building off of the premise; from each according to their ability to each according to their need.
Communism is a classless society in which private ownership has been abolished and the means of production and subsistence belong to the community. Communism is a society where each one works according to his abilities and gets according to his needs. Today we work hard just to survive and we can barely do that. Many people work multiple jobs to do just that, while others whose work is regarded as important contribute little to the whole. When we think of disease prevention we only give credit to the doctors, what of the garbage workers and waste disposal units? Without the later would we not have streets filled with rotting food, sewers overflowing with feces and waste? The doctor would then be of little use as everyone would be sick and dying at higher rates than even now. However a doctor is paid even more than these unsung heroes. Why? One commonly given answer is that the doctor paid a lot of money for school and spent a lot of time to get when they are. There is that thing hinders us all, money. What if the doctor did not need to pay money to get where they are? Someone would say no one would want to do such a job without payment. Surely this is not emotionally true, someone has to desire the knowledge and satisfaction the job brings. Though in a communistic society, without currency, being a doctor, doing what you are capable of doing guarantees you all your needs. Home, food, and the same luxuries as everyone else, so long as you put into the society it will give back. When you break it down to the essential variables that affect everyone, no one is more or less important than another. This does not lead to a loss of individuality that is built as you grow. Without currency education is free for as long as you seek it and give labor into society. All the people who would not be able to afford an education and reach their full potential in the current world society could reach the stars. Some think in a communistic society everyone would be in cookie cutter houses. This would be untrue housing would be based on needs. There are many routed for these needs, one person merely needs a studio apartment or single bedroom, and I am sure the math is easy to follow from there. There are homeless that wish to work to obtain housing, in a communist society the employer is not bound by a status quo and can hire without limit. In this economic world all things are centered on the almighty dollar, but in a communist society the center is the people. Sure production will change within a company from one thing to another to keep up with the demand, but nobody would be without. Children would not need to work and the age 18 could be a possibility to start putting into the whole. Since everyone would be working somewhere the overall quality of life would be improved. This is however something that could only be acquired if done worldwide. There are materials only certain regions have and others need everyone works together giving without currency exchanged and receiving what they need in return. Everyone and everything is of equal importance, there is no pound per pound exchange no bartering. Everyone benefits when everyone works whether it be as a doctor, teacher, driver, stocker, manager or anything else. People can do the jobs they desire and while contributing to society want nothing it’s all provided. Some think luxuries like televisions and games would not count to the need mentioned, and they don’t but when everyone is working such luxuries can be provided to everyone. As I said however either everyone is in or no one is, sure a few that don’t want to work would need to be excluded from the whole. With this society the entire human race would prosper and not just lucky individuals, is that not what we strive for? It does no good to place all power and wealth in one place or on one person, but when all people are equal it takes more to conquer us than when there are fewer beacons to take. Many look at how communism has played out in the world and have disdain for it and i will tell you why. in the world communism is used as a government when it is not. communism is the idea of the people for the people where the only thing is the people. communism is just this, the abolition of currency and the building off of the premise; from each according to their ability to each according to their need.
Friday, July 22, 2011
Anarchy
Anarchy is a theory that regards the absence of all direct or coercive government as a political ideal. Anarchy proposes the cooperative and voluntary association of individuals and groups as the principal mode of organized society. Instead of having a system ever looming over the people, the people would decide how to deal with situations. A truly circumstance based model that could deal with the fine details, rather than apply vague overstatements blanketed in political concerns. In a state of anarchy the only premise that is followed is an overarching social contract. It is not law, but merely an idea to which all minds are built upon. Each may follow their own path until harm of the mind or body occurs to an unwilling recipient. From there we build upon each other when the time arises within our local region. This region can be as small as family and as large as the globe varying based on the event at hand. With ever advancing technologies such organization can occur with ease. If a new road needs to be built the region affected assembles as it does now to determine the necessary actions. The difference is this assembly is only for the road, only people that care and are affected. The assembly must ensure no one will be harmed by the decisions. New decisions are easily made to accommodate that person and the road is built. Once built the assembly disembarks. The main crimes in an anarchic world are those that cause harm upon others; murder, rape, torture physical damage and forms of psychological damage such as that which could provoke suicide. Again the affected region deals with the crime where there is no judge only a mass jury varying again on region and issue. Since these crimes break the socially accepted contract, the criminals are no longer protected in the society. Two mentionable options to deal with criminals is isolation like prison and termination or death. Punishments can and should vary, some criminal actions affect others for the rest of their life and so should the punishment. There are too many variables to cover here that affect decisions but an assembly can better weigh and understand each one. Some may not automatically see the benefit of such a society that is fluid and without leadership. If you compare Anarchy to systems today it gives the results the others seek. Governments make laws that hinder some, benefit others and are hard to overcome when it’s really necessary. Only those with enough money can afford a lawyer to overcome laws that don’t benefit them. Whereas anarchy is situation based, rulings change for similar cases due to circumstances that make the difference. No one is held to laws which most hinder us, for actions of such laws rarely if ever harm others. As well as the fact laws do no good until someone breaks one and is caught anarchy does not vary. There is no way to prevent bad people from doing bad things, but we can allow good people to act as they wish without harming others. Each may follow their own path until harm of the mind or body occurs to an unwilling recipient.
New World
There are theories on societal reformation that have been disregarded by our world. The current course of action however is not working. Economies are crashing, wars are blazing strong, disease is rampant, and the people sit by as their lives are being controlled without true representation. If things do not change through us things will change so hard and fast we may not recover. I propose a deeper look into theories like anarchy and communism that eliminate governments and currency. They instill unity through common ground and preference, these are words never heard with such ideas. When we think of anarchy we think of chaos, but that cannot be further from the truth. When we hear communism we hear conformity and dictator for that is how others have applied it, but even their understanding is flawed. The untraveled road is dark and unfamiliar but once we begin down it we see what beauty is hidden on it. Both theories mentioned only work when the people work together, and the outcome is bliss. All must be on board before the ship to a new world can sail, if not we continue towards fallout, famine, and depression. We are led into those dark worlds by governments and currency where they then abandon us. As a people we should not fear for tomorrow, if we build a world without government and currency we will prosper together. I will explain in further detail soon the benefits anarchy and communism bring.
Monday, July 18, 2011
Friday, July 15, 2011
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)